The laws of skateboarding. Taken from the Australian Road Rules as approved by the Australian Transport Council and published by the Australian Transport Commission Feb 2009.
The Australian Transport council was setup to streamline national road rules under agreement by all states and territories' transport and roads Ministers. Under agreement of the Australian Transport Council all states and territories are obliged to create legislation that is constant with the National Road Rules 2009. Given that our members come from all over Australia this is the most relevant document.
Tags: FAQ, Laws, Skateboard laws, cops, lawyer, lawyers, legal, police, road rules, rules
Ok, so another strange update from SA.
Talking with the Willunga boys and their Lawyer on Monday the lawyer tells us that he has never heard of any laws regarding skateboards, marked roads, speed limits or night time. Thinking this was a bit strange I have looked the current road traffic act for SA http://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/C/A/ROAD%20TRAFFIC%20ACT%201961...
(Part 99B, page 45) and have found that he was right. There is no where I can see that says we can't be on the road. Thinking this may be a new thing put in place I looked at two other previous acts from the beginning of 2010 until the current one and they both say the exact same thing. This would mean that anyone who has been given and payed a fine in SA has payed money that they didn't owe.
Hoping that Robbo or Haggy can shed some light?
I have answered my own question. As far as us South Aussies go, there are two road traffic acts. There are the Australian road rules which are attached to this conversation. There is also the South Australian road traffic act which is specific to us and changes slightly from state to state.
The 1st one says all the stuff we already know. No dividing line, no roads with a speed limit of 50 or above, and no night time riding.
The SA traffic act is what the boys have been arrested for. The first thing it says is that you must ride with ''due care''. They were arrested for riding without due care. If the video footage in court shows them crossing a solid white line, cutting a corner or anything else then the police will have proved their point.
I think that is the answer anywho.
I cant find anywhere where the Australian Road rules have been enacted into law by amendment or regulation within SA regarding skateboards. They have cherry picked a few amendments regarding street signs and whatnot but have made no regulation regarding wheeled recreational devices. The Traffic act does not even attempt to explain what a wheeled recreational devise is. Due care is a broad term and seems to also be applied to pedestrians without again explaining what due care actually is.
I agree that there is nothing within the Act or done by regulation or amendment that says a skateboard cannot be ridden on any road at any speed at any time of day or night. I would argue that 'Due Care' is entirely ambiguous and could not possibly be understood by a citizen when its application is given no explanation within the act. Unlike almost every other traffic act in the country the SA Traffic Act also gives no explanation as to what a wheel recreational device is.I would argue that Due Care only applies and than only in an ambiguous way where a road user has an interaction with another road user.
just to make it easy for people, here is the relevant section
99B—Wheeled recreational devices and wheeled toys
(1) A person must not ride a wheeled recreational device or wheeled toy on a road without
due care or attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the
road.
(2) A person must not, on a footpath or other road-related area, ride a wheeled
recreational device or wheeled toy abreast of a vehicle or another wheeled recreational
device or wheeled toy.
(3) A person who is riding a wheeled recreational device or wheeled toy on a footpath or
other road-related area must, where it is necessary to do so for the purpose of averting
danger, give warning (by a warning device or other means) to pedestrians or other
persons using the footpath or other road-related area.
(4) A road authority incurs no civil liability because of an act or omission on its part in the
design, construction, maintenance or management of a road to take account of the fact
that the users or potential users of the road include riders of wheeled recreational
devices or wheeled toys.
(5) In this section—
management of a road includes placement, design, construction or maintenance of
traffic control devices, barriers, trees or other objects or structures on the road;
road authority means—
(a) the Minister; or
(b) the Commissioner of Highways; or
(c) a council; or
(d) any body or person in whom the care, control or management of a road is
vested.
Due care is applied in SA in the same way as neg driving is applied in every other state. As is the case in other states it is unusual to apply the offence in the absence of some other chargeable offence. It could be argued under SA law that no chargable offence has been committed and therefore might be difficult to prove a lack of due care. Crossing a white line in a wheeled recreational device in the absence of traffic or some other dangerous obstacle could not by default be considered as an absence of due care as the original action is not illegal under SA law.
It is unusual in a legal act not explain the references to terms used inside that document when they apply to offenses. That is normally very common place stuff and is done to avoid ambiguity that can easily be exploited by lawyers. When you leave these explanations to common law particularly in an area where common law has only a small amount of application like the traffic act, you expose yourself to defenses based on a lot of interpretation. It all seems very untidy. If you read the entire SA traffic act it all looks like a bit of a hack job with no particular pattern in amendments or regulation
You would think that they would make all these garbage laws fit together properly, rather than putting duct tape laws all over to try and fill the gaps!
The law is basically interpreted a different way by every cop I have met... it's ridiculous, what ever happened to serving the citizens not serving your own personal opinion?
Any half-decent lawyer, particularly one who regularly does traffic violoations, should be able to pick the "due care" provision apart. What does "due care" mean when you're riding a skateboard down a road??? Exactly, even on this site, where we all skate, there will be a 100 different answers. Arguably, depending on the circumstances, you may not be exercising due care if it results in someone else's injury. That clearly was not the case here. Another example of police making judgments about the "safety" of a sport they have no understanding of at all. Therefore there is no frame of reference for a cop to even say you were riding without "due care". It becomes nonsensical.
I hope for god's sake that you guys win this case. It's such utter crap....
I can't even believe the extent to which there actually is regulation governing skateboards, rollerblades, etc. It proves that we are way too obsessed with regulating everything in this country. I'm getting riled up!!!
On a side note, the SA Traffic Act 1961 does define "wheeled recreational device"
wheeled recreational device means a wheeled device, built to transport a person,
propelled by human power or gravity, and ordinarily used for recreation or play,
and—
(a) includes rollerblades, rollerskates, a skateboard or similar wheeled device; but
(b) does not include a golf buggy, pram, stroller or trolley, or a bicycle,
wheelchair or wheeled toy;
© 2025 Created by Bugs.
Powered by